Commonwealth v. Richman ( 1974 )


Menu:
  • Concurring Opinion by

    Mr. Justice Roberts :

    I readily join the opinion of the Court. And I agree with the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Eagen to the extent that it asserts as a matter of state law, see Commonwealth v. Whiting, 439 Pa. 205, 266 A.2d 738, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 919, 91 S. Ct. 173 (1970); Pa. Const. Art. I, § 9, that in this Commonwealth arrest is the initial point of the accusatory criminal process. In the view of both the majority and Mr. Justice Ea-gen — a view that I share — an accused is entitled to counsel at any lineup conducted after arrest.

    Mr. Justice Manderino joins in this concurring opinion.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, 471

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Filed Date: 5/22/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024