Hamilton v. Moore , 1 L. Ed. 642 ( 1797 )

3 U.S. 371 (____) 3 Dall. 371

HAMILTON
versus
MOORE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Ingersoll and Dallas, for the Defendant in error.

But, THE COURT observed, that there was no error in point of fact; nor any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was actually sued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal.

The Writ of Error was, therefore, non-prossed.