Malaske v. State , 75 O.B.A.J. 1498 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • STRUBHAR, J.,

    dissenting.

    ¶ 1 I dissent. I find merit in Proposition III. The prosecutor, in his closing arguments, made a continuing series of improper arguments. The prosecutor’s confrontational and bullying approach directed towards the defense attorney was not only inappropriate but absurd; however, when the defense counsel objected, the trial court improperly overruled the objection. Additionally, the prosecutor misstated the law on several significant occasions. These errors cannot be considered harmless. I would reverse and remand for a new trial.

Document Info

Docket Number: F-2002-1085

Citation Numbers: 2004 OK CR 18, 89 P.3d 1116, 75 O.B.A.J. 1498, 2004 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21, 2004 WL 842436

Judges: Lumpkin, Johnson, Lile, Chapel, Strubhar

Filed Date: 4/21/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024