State ex rel. Warren v. Friedland , 2013 Ohio 2102 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Warren v. Friedland, 
    2013-Ohio-2102
    .]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    No. 99541
    STATE OF OHIO, EX REL.,
    JEROME WARREN
    RELATOR
    vs.
    CAROLYN B. FRIEDLAND, C.P. JUDGE
    RESPONDENT
    JUDGMENT:
    WRIT DENIED
    Writ of Mandamus
    Motion No. 463037
    Order No. 463915
    RELEASE DATE:               May 22, 2013
    FOR RELATOR
    Jerome Warren, pro se
    Inmate No. 631-319
    Richland Correctional Institution
    P.O. Box 8107
    Mansfield, Ohio 44901
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
    Timothy J. McGinty
    Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
    By: James E. Moss
    Assistant County Prosecutor
    Justice Center - 9th Floor
    1200 Ontario Street
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.:
    {¶1}   On February 15, 2013, the relator, Jerome Warren, commenced this
    mandamus action against the respondent, Judge Carolyn B. Friedland, to compel her to
    rule on Warren’s motions for 85 days of jail-time credit, filed on
    December 6, 2012, in the underlying cases, State v. Warren, Cuyahoga C.P.               Nos.
    CR-560296 and CR-560298. On March 5, 2013, the respondent moved for summary
    judgment on the grounds of mootness.       Attached to the dispositive motion were certified
    copies of March 4, 2013 journal entries granting 84 days of jail-time credit in the
    underlying cases.   This establishes that Warren has received his requested relief. State
    ex rel. Corder v. Wilson, 
    68 Ohio App.3d 567
    , 
    589 N.E.2d 113
     (10th Dist.1991).        It also
    appears that Warren has fully served his sentence because of the jail-time credit.         A
    review of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s website showed that the
    Department had adjusted Warren’s release date to March 13, 2013, after the respondent
    had granted the additional credit and released him to the supervision of the Adult Parole
    Authority. This action is moot.
    {¶2} Accordingly, the court grants the respondent’s motion for summary judgment
    and denies the application for a writ of mandamus.      Each side to bear their own costs.
    The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry
    upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
    {¶3} Writ denied.
    __________________________________________
    KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE
    FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and
    SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99541

Citation Numbers: 2013 Ohio 2102

Judges: Rocco

Filed Date: 5/22/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014