State v. Sammons ( 2011 )

[Cite as State v. Sammons, 2011-Ohio-4395.]
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SUMMIT )
STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 25580
Appellee
v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
ENTERED IN THE
DEMARDRE T. SAMMONS COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO
Appellant CASE No. CR 10 01 0020 (B)
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
Dated: August 31, 2011
MOORE, Judge.
{¶1} Appellant, Demardre T. Sammons, appeals from the judgment of the Summit
County Court of Common Pleas. We affirm.
I.
{¶2} On the evening of January 4, 2010, at approximately 7:00 p.m., Amanda
Bransteter was walking home on Sumner Street in the University area of Akron, Ohio. She
testified that as she reached the intersection of Sumner and Thornton Streets, two individuals ran
up from behind and ordered her to give them her purse. They were dressed in black and wearing
ski masks. One of the individuals pointed a gun at her, while the other went through her purse
and pockets. She recalled a “clicking sound” sound when the gun was pointed at her. After
finding nothing of value in her purse and pockets, the two assailants returned her purse, told her
to “have a nice day,” and ran away. Amanda immediately went home and called a friend, who in
turn summoned the police.
2
{¶3} Officer Todd Sinsley of the Akron Police Department testified that he was
working a one-man cruiser on the evening of January 4, 2010. He was the first officer to respond
to the robbery dispatch. He was told that a robbery had just occurred within the last five minutes
at Sumner and Thornton Streets. Dispatch advised him that the only description they had was
that there were two males, wearing dark clothing and ski masks. As he was patrolling the area,
he observed “two individuals wearing all dark clothing [and] ski masks.” As he approached
them in his cruiser, both individuals started running. He followed them in his cruiser. As he
turned on Allyn Street, he saw a man, later identified as the appellant, Demardre Sammons, still
running. Officer Sinsley pulled his vehicle in front of Sammons, drew his weapon and
apprehended him. Sammons was no longer wearing a ski mask. As the officer was patting down
Sammons, he saw the codefendant, Gregory Williams, emerge from the same location that
Sammons had been. The officer ordered Williams to the ground, but he took off running again.
{¶4} Officer Sinsley proceeded to make sure Sammons did not possess any weapons
and then placed him in the back of his cruiser. He advised dispatch that Williams had run away.
While in the backseat of the cruiser, Sammons began “squirming” and “bouncing around in [the]
back seat.” When Officer Sinsley went to investigate, he found that Sammons was trying to kick
a ski mask under the front passenger seat. The ski mask, with a white Nike logo, was later
identified by Amanda as one of the masks worn by her assailants during the robbery.
{¶5} Officer Sinsley testified that given the amount of fresh snow on the ground that
evening, it was not difficult to track Williams. This was confirmed by Officer Patrick Neumann.
He, along with his partner, traced the footprints of Williams and found him hiding under a porch
at 419 Rentschler Street. A second ski mask was found in Williams’ pocket. In retracing
Williams’ footsteps left in the snow, Officer Neumann located a gun underneath a tire ramp. It
3
was later identified as a loaded Bursa .380 caliber semi-automatic pistol. Officer Sinsley, who
was standing about six feet from Officer Neumann when he located the gun, discovered that the
gun had been cocked, with a cartridge in the camber, ready to fire. This was consistent with
Amanda’s statement that she heard a “clicking sound” when the gun was pointed at her.
{¶6} On January 15, 2010, Sammons and codefendant Williams were indicted on one
count of aggravated robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), a felony of the first degree,
along with an accompanying firearm specification, one count of tampering with evidence in
violation of R.C. 2921.12, a felony of the third degree, and one count of obstructing official
business in violation of R.C. 2921.31(A), a misdemeanor of the second degree. On August 2,
2010, the case was tried to a jury. The jury found Sammons guilty on all counts. On August 11,
2010, the trial court sentenced him to eight years of incarceration.
{¶7} Sammons timely filed a notice of appeal.
II.
{¶8} Sammons’ counsel did not raise an assignment of error. In accordance with
Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, Sammons’ counsel has asserted that he is unable to
find any issue upon which to argue error below. He also has moved to withdraw as counsel for
Sammons.
{¶9} Sammons failed to respond to his counsel’s Anders brief. He has not otherwise
offered any arguments to support a reversal of his conviction and/or sentence in this case. Upon
our own full, independent examination of the record before this Court, we find that there are no
appealable, non-frivolous issues in this case. See State v. Lowe (Apr. 8, 1998), 9th Dist. No.
97CA006758, at *2.
4
III.
{¶10} Having reviewed the entire record, and concluding that the trial court’s
proceedings were proper, this Court grants the motion to withdraw and affirms Sammons’
conviction and sentence.
{¶11} The judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
Sammons’ counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is hereby granted.
Judgment affirmed.
There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common
Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy
of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.
Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of
judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the
period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(E). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is
instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the
mailing in the docket, pursuant to App.R. 30.
Costs taxed to Appellant.
CARLA MOORE
FOR THE COURT
5
WHITMORE, P. J.
DICKINSON, J.
CONCUR
APPEARANCES:
JEFFREY N. JAMES, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.
SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and HEAVEN DIMARTINO, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.