In re Dougherty , 2013 Ohio 2841 ( 2013 )

[Cite as In re Dougherty, 2013-Ohio-2841.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE MATTER OF THE MEMORANDUM OPINION
GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES
ROBERT DOUGHERTY
CASE NO. 2013-A-0023
Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, Case No. 2012 GI
043.
Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
Jonathan W. Winer, 5276 Rome Rock Creek Road, Rome, OH 44085-9616 (For
Appellant).
CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.
{¶1} On April 16, 2013, appellant, Veronica K. Wessell, by and through
counsel, filed a notice of appeal from a March 18, 2013 magistrate’s order from the
Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, in which the magistrate
dismissed appellant’s application for guardianship without prejudice.
{¶2} Initially, we must determine whether there is a final appealable order since
this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments or orders. Noble v.
Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92 (1989). According to Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio
Constitution, an appellate court can immediately review a judgment of a trial court only if
it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. No. 2003-L-116,
2003-Ohio-6241, ¶3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court does
not have jurisdiction to review the matter and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc.
Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). For a judgment to be final
and appealable, it must satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and, if applicable,
Civ.R. 54(B).
{¶3} Pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B), there are five categories of a “final order,”
and if a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be considered an order which
can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals. R.C. 2505.02(B)(1)
provides an order: “[t]hat affects a substantial right in an action that in effect determines
the action and prevents a judgment” is final and appealable. Civ.R. 54(B) provides, in
relevant part: “When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action * * *
whether arising out of the same or separate transactions, * * * the court may enter final
judgment as to one or more but fewer than all the claims * * * only upon expressed
determination that there is no just cause for delay.”
{¶4} Under Civ.R. 53(D)(2)(a)(i), “a magistrate may enter orders without judicial
approval if necessary to regulate the proceedings and if not dispositive of a claim or
defense of a party.” This court had previously stated that pursuant to Civ.R.
53(D)(2)(a)(i), magistrate orders require trial court approval if they dispose of a party’s
claim. Estate of Persing, 11th Dist. No. 2009-T-0120, 2010-Ohio-2687, ¶35.
{¶5} This court has also held that there is no final judgment where the trial
court fails to both adopt the magistrate’s decision and enter judgment stating the relief
to be afforded because “orders are not court orders unless certain formalities are met.”
See Wheeler v. Tubbs, 11th Dist. No. 2008-L-159, 2008-Ohio-6411, ¶7. Additionally,
only judges, not magistrates, may terminate claims or actions by entering judgment. Id.;
2
see also Ingledue v. Premier Siding & Roofing, Inc., 5th Dist. No. 2005CAE120088,
2006 Ohio App. LEXIS 2543, 2006-Ohio-2698, ¶11-13.
{¶6} In the instant matter, the trial court failed to enter judgment stating the
relief to be afforded. Therefore, at this point, there is no order issued by the trial court
that fits within any of the categories of R.C. 2505.02. The March 18, 2013 magistrate’s
order is not a final appealable order, and this court does not have jurisdiction to hear
this appeal. Since the magistrate’s decision has not yet been adopted by the trial court,
it remains an interlocutory order and may be reconsidered upon the court’s own motion
or that of a party.
{¶7} Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of
jurisdiction.
{¶8} Appeal dismissed.
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.,
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,
concur.
3