-
OSCN Found Document:PACK v. STATE
OSCN navigation
- Previous Case
- Top Of Index
- This Point in Index
- Citationize
- Next Case
PACK v. STATE
2014 OK 66
Case Number: 112974
Decided: 07/15/2014
THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2014 OK 66, __ P.3d __CHARLES EDWARD PACK, II; MARA NOVY; LEONARDO DE ANDRADE; ELIZABETH LUECKE; NANCY KUNSMAN; HEATHER SPARKS; LEO J. BAXTER; AMY ANNE FORD; WILLIAM F. SHDEED; and DANIEL KEATING, Petitioners,
v.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA; PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE; SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; THE OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondents.MEMORANDUM OPINION
¶1 Having considered the application to assume original jurisdiction, petition for a writ, and request for declaratory relief along with the response thereto, the associated briefs of the parties, and all amici and other filings in the cause, THE COURT DETERMINES THAT:
1) We have jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter and the issues are ripe for adjudication. Furthermore, the immediacy with which the school year will commence makes this an appropriate matter for the assumption of original jurisdiction. Oklahoma Farm Bureau v. State Bd. of Educ., 1968 OK 98, 444 P.2d 182.
2) HB 3399 does not violate art. 13, §5 or art. 4, §1 of the Oklahoma Constitution.
3) Having found HB 3399 constitutional, there is no need to address the issue of severability.
¶2 Original jurisdiction is assumed; HB 3399 is not unconstitutional under either art. 13, §5 or art. 4, §1 of the Oklahoma Constitution; and it is unnecessary to address the issue of severability.
COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON, TAYLOR, COMBS, JJ. - concur.
GURICH, J. - concurs in part and dissents in part.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Citationizer: Table of AuthorityCite Name Level None Found. Cite Name Level None Found.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 2014 OK 66
Filed Date: 7/15/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 3/3/2016