-
Nathan Elmont ELI, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Louis S. NELSON, Warden, California State Prison at San
Quentin, Respondent-Appellee.No. 73-2346.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 9, 1974.
1Paul N. Halvonik (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
2Karl S. Mayer, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellee.
3Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and McGOVERN,1 district judge.
ORDER AFFIRMING
4The district court order denying habeas corpus relief on a state judgment is affirmed. See Eli v. Nelson, 360 F. Supp. 225 (N.D.Cal.1973).
5The district court examined the state court record and was satisfied that questions concerning Eli's confession were adequately explored by the state court.
6We conclude that the federal district court ruling that no evidentiary hearing was necessary was within its discretion.
7The case is pre Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), but post Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S. Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977 (1964). The district court found on the record that there was no violation of Escobedo. The finding was justified.
1The Honorable Walter T. McGovern, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation
Document Info
Docket Number: 73-2346
Judges: Chambers, Wright, McGovern
Filed Date: 7/9/1974
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/4/2024