N. H. Newman v. State of Alabama and Bill Baxley, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, United States of America, Amicus Curiae , 522 F.2d 71 ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM:

    The judgment of the district court as it relates to the award of attorneys’ fees,* Newman v. State of Alabama, M.D.Ala., 1972, 349 F.Supp. 278, is vacated and the cause is remanded for reconsideration consistent with the supervening decisions of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. The Wilderness Society, 1975, 421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141, and Edelman v. Jordan, 1974, 415 U.S. 651, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662.

    Vacated and remanded with direction.

    The remaining issues were resolved in Newman v. State of Alabama, 5 Cir., 1974, 503 F.2d 1320.

Document Info

Docket Number: 73-2033

Citation Numbers: 522 F.2d 71, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12170

Judges: Thornberry, Brown, Wisdom, Gewin, Bell, Thorn-Berry, Coleman, Goldberg, Ainsworth, Godbold, Dyer, Simpson, Morgan, Clark, Roney, Gee

Filed Date: 10/29/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024