Locke v. Locke , 153 Cal. 56 ( 1908 )

I concur in the judgment. During the time the plaintiff supported herself she had no cause of action for divorce on the ground of non-support. (Washburn v. Washburn, 9. Cal. 476;Rycraft v. Rycraft, 42 Cal. 445.) The delay during that time to begin the action could not affect the case, for she then had no right of action. The cause of action she had was for non-support during the year ending in October, 1906. She began the action therefor on November 8, 1906.