People v. Van Cleave , 208 Cal. 295 ( 1929 )


Menu:
  • WASTE, C. J., Dissenting.

    I dissent. The majority opinion admits, without qualification, that “there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict. ’ ’ The further analysis of the evidence made “in order to determine whether there has probably been a miscarriage of justice,” because of the errors committed by the trial court, does not, in my opinion, establish that the case was “a close one.” The evidence in the case, aside from, and unaffected by, any errors of the trial court, being sufficient to support the conviction, no miscarriage of justice resulted.

    Richards, J., concurred.

Document Info

Docket Number: Docket No. Crim. 3250.

Citation Numbers: 280 P. 983, 208 Cal. 295, 1929 Cal. LEXIS 384

Judges: Preston, Waste

Filed Date: 9/28/1929

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2024