Dade County v. Kerce , 137 Fla. 194 ( 1938 )


Menu:
  • I am unable to concur in the conclusion reached in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice WHITFIELD for two reasons.

    Chapter 17974 is, in my opinion, nothing more nor less than a local and special law applying, and intending to apply, only to Dade County.

    In the enactment of this special and local statute, the *Page 216 provisions of Section 21, Article III of the Constitution was not complied with and, therefore, it never became a law. If we try to sustain the Act as a general law, we must find some basis in reason for the classification used. I am unable to find any basis in reason why such legislation should be confined to only that county having a population of more than 180,000.

    The other reason is that the Act attempts to appropriate a State tax to the payment of outstanding County and District bonds. A State tax can not be appropriated for such purpose. See Amos v. Matthews, 99 Fla. 65, 126 So. 308.

    Therefore, I think the order appealed from should be affirmed.

    ELLIS, C.J., and BROWN, J., concur.

    ON REHEARING
    En Banc.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 188 So. 642, 137 Fla. 194, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1708

Judges: Brown, Buford, Chapman, Ci-Iapman, Ellis, I-Concur, Terrell, Thomas, Whitfield

Filed Date: 10/5/1938

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024