-
For the most recent opinion of this subject see Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy,
57 S. Ct. 908 , 81 L. Ed. ___, decided May 17, 1937, wherein a full discussion is to be found. Conceding the propriety of the practice of submitting a case to a trial jury on a reserved ruling on a motion for directed verdict, even withconsent of the parties, the limit of the court's authority in the premises, *Page 424 after verdict actually rendered, is to thereafter grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict should have been directed for the opposite party as a matter of law which would therefore make the verdict contrary to law a recognized ground for new trial. I think the Court could grant a new trial without separate motion under such circumstances.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 174 So. 841, 128 Fla. 418
Judges: BROWN, J.
Filed Date: 6/4/1937
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023