Railway Express Agency Inc. v. Standridge , 68 Ga. App. 843 ( 1943 )

Sutton, J.

This case is controlled by Railway Express Agency Inc. v. Standridge, ante. The court did not err in overruling the defendants’ motion for new trial; and because of this ruling it is unnecessary to decide the questions raised in the cross-bill of exceptions of the defendant in error, and the same is dismissed.

Judgment affirmed on the maim hill of exceptions. Oross-hill dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Felton, J., concur.