Akana v. Espinda , 1935 Haw. LEXIS 40 ( 1935 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The record in this case discloses that there was a money judgment against the defendant, the plaintiff in error, in the court below, that the same is un *315 satisfied and that no bond for the payment of the judgment was filed with the clerk of this court prior to or at the time of the issuance of the writ of error by the clerk. Under the authority of IP. Au Hoy v. Ching Mun Shee, ante p. 240, this court is without jurisdiction and the writ of error is therefore dismissed.

    G. B. Dwight for plaintiff in error, J. 8. Ferry for defendant in error.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2142.

Citation Numbers: 33 Haw. 314, 1935 Haw. LEXIS 40

Judges: <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

Filed Date: 2/18/1935

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024