Timmins v. Pfeifer ( 1930 )

Hilton, J.

(concurring in part).

I agree that there should he a reversal for the reason stated in paragraph four of the opinion. However I am of opinion that the' trial court was right in its conclusion; that Amelia Fisher acquired no immediate interest in the property or indebtedness in 1906 when the conveyance was made to the defendant; that plaintiff obtained no right under the attempted assignment in 1910; that in any event, had there been such a right, her claim became barred by the statute of limitations.