Seaver v. Manchester Street Railway , 78 N.H. 584 ( 1916 )

Peaslee, J.

The defendant claims that verdicts should have been directed because upon one construction of Mrs. Seaver’s testimony it could have been found that the steps were “all right.” But another and equally legitimate interpretation of her testimony leads to the conclusion that the steps were icy, slippery and dangerous.

Exception overruled-

All concurred.