Murphy v. Zink ( 1948 )

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Burling in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.