-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 181 A. 168, 115 N.J.L. 559, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 349
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 10/9/1935
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024