Thomas v. Thomas , 104 N.J. Eq. 607 ( 1929 )


Menu:
  • *610 Per Curiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

    For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tbenchaed, Pabkee, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 146 A. 431, 104 N.J. Eq. 607, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 554

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 5/20/1929

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024