City of Millville v. Everingham , 101 N.J.L. 566 ( 1925 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Mone.