Wells v. Bennett ( 1926 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.