-
*389 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance —The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 388, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 192
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 1/22/1943
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024