-
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 492
Document Info
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 2/4/1929
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 5/5/2017