-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, JJ. 7.
For reversal — Katzenbach, White, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 4.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 134 A. 915, 102 N.J.L. 712, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 227
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 10/18/1926
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024