Hutchinson v. Conkling , 111 N.J. Eq. 471 ( 1932 )


Menu:
  • Pee Cueiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

    For affirmance — The Chancellob, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 162 A. 755, 111 N.J. Eq. 471, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 757

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 10/17/1932

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024