Sharp v. Borough of Vineland , 118 N.J.L. 567 ( 1937 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Cole, JJ. 9.

    For reversal — Bodine, Heher, Rafferty, JJ. 3.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 194 A. 260, 118 N.J.L. 567, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 323

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 9/22/1937

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024