-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Donges, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Cole, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Bodine, Heher, Rafferty, JJ. 3.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 194 A. 260, 118 N.J.L. 567, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 323
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 9/22/1937
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024