Morgan v. Susino Construction Co. , 131 N.J.L. 329 ( 1944 )

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N.J.L. 455.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 10.

For reversal — HEHER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3.