Maisto v. Maisto , 124 N.J.L. 565 ( 1940 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Heiiee, Peeskie, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.