Tams v. Abrams , 120 N.J. Eq. 253 ( 1936 )

Per Curiam.

The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.