McLaughlin v. Hahne & Co. ( 1934 )

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Hehee, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.