New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Riordan , 103 N.J.L. 498 ( 1926 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Hone.