Roberts v. City of Orange ( 1926 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be-affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.