-
Considering the fact that this is a summary proceeding, where prompt action is necessary, we find no question of law is presented which requires reversal. (Election Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 17], §§ 330, 335.)
The Supreme Court made "such order as justice may require," within the contemplation of the Election Law. (§ 330.) To order a new trial at this time for technical errors not affecting substantial rights would be a futility.
The order should be affirmed.
POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ., concur; LEHMAN, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed. *Page 609
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 193 N.E. 342, 265 N.Y. 607, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1206
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Filed Date: 10/31/1934
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024