-
This case was argued with that of Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund LifeAssociation, and as it involves the same principles and facts almost identical, it is governed by the decision in that case. The judgment is
Affirmed.
No. 3. (977)
E. G. Hill against same defendant. Same counsel appearing.
35 S.E. 125
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 36 S.E. 352, 126 N.C. 971, 54 L.R.A. 605, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 344
Judges: Douglas
Filed Date: 6/9/1900
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024