Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n , 54 L.R.A. 605 ( 1900 )


Menu:
  • This case was argued with that of Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund LifeAssociation, and as it involves the same principles and facts almost identical, it is governed by the decision in that case. The judgment is

    Affirmed.

    No. 3. (977)

    E. G. Hill against same defendant. Same counsel appearing. 35 S.E. 125

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 36 S.E. 352, 126 N.C. 971, 54 L.R.A. 605, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 344

Judges: Douglas

Filed Date: 6/9/1900

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024