Guthrie National Bank v. Dosbaugh , 11 Okla. 664 ( 1902 )

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

One J. J. Wilson owned several hundred cattle, which were located in the state of Kansas. Peter O’Connor assisted by H. H. Hagan bought these cattle from Wilson and paid him fifteen hundred dollars on the purchase price and were to pay the balance on delivery. When Hagan and O’Connor went to get the cattle a dispute arose between them and Wilson as to the terms of the contract of sale, and Wilson refused to make delivery, and Hagan and O’Connor claim that he also refused to return the fifteen hundred dollars. The fact of this controversy was made known to the defendant in error, Do'sbaugh’s bank, but finally Hagan and O’Connor agreed to accede to Wilson’s demands, and Hagan drew a draft on the Guthrie National . bank, of Guthrie, O. T. for the money with which to pay for the cattle. This draft was as follows:

“Dosbaugh’s Bank.

“Cedarvale, Kansas, October 6th, 1898.

“Pay to the order of Dosbaugh’s Bank, $10,268.40, Ten Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty-Eight and 40-100 Dollars. Yalue received, and charge to account of,

“(Signed) H. H. Hagan.

“To Guthrie National Bank, Guthrie, O. T.”

On the face of this draft also appears the following memoranda:

“For payment of 400 steers, sold to Peter O’Connor.”

Before accepting the draft and advancing the money on it, Dosbaugh’s Bank sent the following message to the Guthrie National Bank:

“Cedarvale, Kansas. . • October 6th, 1898.

“To the Guthrie National Bank, Guthrie, 0. T.

“Is H. H. Hagan’s check good for ten thousand five hundred dollars. Answer at once.

“(Signed) Dosbaugh’s Bank.”

The Guthrie National bank then answered this message in the following language:

“Guthrie, O. T., October 6th, 1898.

“Dosbaugh’s Bank, Cedarvale, Kansas.

“Hagan’s check for balance due Wilson is good.

“(Signed) Guthrie, National Bank.”

Upon receipt of this reply Dosbaugh’s Bank gave to Wilson a certificate of deposit for the amount of the draft, and the cattle were then delivered to Hagan and O’Connor. Dosbaugh’s Bank forwarded the draft to its correspondent in Kansas City, and it sent it to a bank in Gntbrie for collection, but when tbe Guthrie bank presented the draft to the Guthrie National for payment, the latter refused 'to pay it, and the draft then went to protest.

Subsequently by an arrangement between all of the parties the Guthrie National bank paid on the draft the sum of nine thousand seven hundred and twenty-four dollars and forty cents, and Dosbaugh’s Bank then commenced this action in the district court of Logan county for the difference between that amount and the face of the draft with interest. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for six hundred and seventeen dollars and ninety-two cents, and tbe defendant appealed.

It is contended by the plaintiff in error, (1,) that the $617.92 was without consideration; that Hagan and O’Con-nor were compelled to agree to pay Wilson that sum in addition to the amount that was actually due him under the contract, or lose the $1,600-which they had actually paid, and, (2,) that the message sent by the Guthrie National bank to Dosbaugh’s Bank limited the liability of the Guthrie National bank to the amount due from O’Connor to Wilson under the original contract.

We cannot agree with counsel for appellant that there was no consideration for the $617.92 in controversy. The draft was not payable to Wilson. If it had been, then ir may be that so long as Wilson remained the owner thereof Hagan could stop payment and lititgate that question; but the draft was payable to Dosbaugh’s Bank, and the proceeds of it paid to Wilson by direction of Hagan, which was equivalent to paying it to Hagan himself.

Now as to the telegram sent by the Guthrie National bank, the language was “Hagan’s check for balance due Wilson is good.” In construing this message and the legal effect to be given it, the court should take into consideration the facts and circumstances surrounding it as disclosed by the record. The Guthrie National bank had given a letter of credit to the amount of $10,500 addressed to Wilson. When Mr. Hagan went to get the money at Dos-baugh’s Barde he exhibited this letter of credit, but it was not addressed to that bank; hence, the message from Dos-baugh’s Bank to the Guthrie National bank asking if Hagan’s cheek for $10,500 was good.

It was intended by all of the parties that Dosbaugh’s Bank should advance the money to close this deal. The Guthrie National bank was assisting Hagan, and it understood that he was buying these cattle from Wilson for O’Connor, but it did not know the exact amount due Wilson on the deal. Otherwise it would have wired' the exact amount for which it would have honored Hagan’s cheek. And this theory is borne out by the letter of credit given to Hagan. It was as follows:

“Guthrie National Bank,

“Guthrie, O. T., October 6th, 1898.

“'Jerome Wilson, Cedarvalo, Kansas.

“Dear Sir: Mr. H. H. Hagan made arrangements with this bank to pay his check for the balance due you on the O’Connor cattle deal with you. We do not know just the amount due you, but about $10,500 will be his cheek.

“Yours resp.

“(Signed J. W. MoNeal, President.”

The only way that Dosbaugh’s Bank could know the amount due on this deal was from reading this letter which Hagan exhibited to its officers, and by what Wilson, Hagan and O’Connor told the officers of the bank, and this fact was known to the Guthrie National bank when it wired the message on October the sixth. Prom this letter it will be seen that the Guthrie National bank expected the check to be for about $10,500, and even if Hagan and O’Connor had previously puchased these cattle for less money than they finally had to pay for them, under all of the circumstances of this case the Guthrie National bank should pay the full face of the draft. The letter of credit which it gave Hagan, together with the message sent by it, undoubtedly induced the officers of Dosbaugh’s Bank. to believe that Hagan had a right to check on it for at least $10,500.

The judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed, at the cost of appellant.

Burford, O. J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Irwin, J'., absent; all the other Justices concurring.