-
Per Curiam, This appeal is dismissed on the following from the opinion of the adjudicating judge, confirmed by the court in banc, refusing to surcharge the accountant: “In the light of all the testimony the auditing judge is of the opinion that the accountant acted.in this matter with common skill, prudence and caution, and properly exer *526 cised the discretion given it by the testator, and therefore should not be surcharged.”
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, 226
Citation Numbers: 256 Pa. 523, 100 A. 953, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 650
Judges: Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart, Frazer
Filed Date: 2/19/1917
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024