Jones v. Quaker City Cab Co. , 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 219 ( 1924 )

Per Curiam,

The only complaint is that the court below refused a new trial. At the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellant frankly stated that he was unable to show any abuse of discretion, contending, however, that this conrt should examine the evidence de novo; the rule is otherwise; his concession leaves nothing for our consideration; if the only complaint is that the court refused a new trial, this court will not interfere unless abuse of discretion is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.