Hall v. State , 32 Tex. Crim. 474 ( 1893 )


Menu:
  • In support of the proposition contained in Judge DAVIDSON'S opinion, that under proper indictment the accused can (on the same trial) be convicted for each day's violation of the statute, I submit the following authorities: 1 Bish. Crim. Proc., sec. 452; Kane v. The People, 8 Wend., 203; Commonwealth v. McChord, 2 Dana, 242; Stone v. The State, 20 N.J. Law, 404; The People v. Costello, 1 Denio, 83; The People v. Gates, 13 Wend., 311; The State v. Kibby, 7 Mo., 317; United States v. O'Callahan, 6 McLean, 596; Orr v. The State, 18 Ark. 540; Covy v. The State, 4 Port. (Ala.), 186; The State v. Bitting,13 Iowa 600; The State v. Gummer, 22 Wis. 441; United States v. Devlin, 6 Blatch., 71; Regina v. Davies, 5 Cox Crim. Cases, 328; Kroer v. The People, 78 Ill. 294; Quinn v. The State,49 Ala. 353; Waddell v. The State, 1 Texas Cr. App., 720; Barnes v. The State, 19 Vt. 398; Commonwealth v. Tuttle, 12 Bush., 505; State v. Adrian, 1 Mich. 495; The State v. Croteau,23 Vt. 14; Mullinix v. The People, 76 Ill. 211.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 696.

Citation Numbers: 24 S.W. 407, 32 Tex. Crim. 474, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 319

Judges: Davidson, Hurt, Simkins

Filed Date: 12/20/1893

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024