-
I agree to reversal, though not to all the reasoning. I think correct conclusion was reached in Combs v. State,
52 Tex. Crim. 613 , and Pratt v. State, 53 Tex.Crim. Rep., in regard to confessions of defendant when used by State to connect him with the alleged offense.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2691.
Citation Numbers: 160 S.W. 465, 71 Tex. Crim. 532, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 508
Judges: Davidson, Harper
Filed Date: 10/29/1913
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/15/2024