In Re the Guardianship of Brown , 6 Wash. 2d 215 ( 1940 )

To avoid any possible confusion or misunderstanding in the future, I think that the majority opinion herein should specifically state that, because of the circumstances here shown, the Departmental opinion herein, ante p. 215, is no longerauthoritative. See Nettleship v. Shipman, 161 Wash. 292, 298,296 P. 1056, 1059; Mitchell v. Maytag-Pacific-IntermountainCo., 184 Wash. 342, 350, 51 P.2d 393, 396.

ROBINSON and DRIVER, JJ., concur with STEINERT, J.