R.S v. S.S. , 2021 Ohio 1384 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as R.S v. S.S., 
    2021-Ohio-1384
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    [R.S.],                                              :
    Petitioner-Appellee,                 :                  No. 20AP-409
    (C.P.C. No. 20DV-1248)
    v.                                                    :
    (ACCELERATED CALENDAR)
    [S.S.],                                              :
    Respondent-Appellant.               :
    D E C I S I O N
    Rendered on April 20, 2021
    On brief: S.S., pro se. Argued: S.S.
    On brief: R.S., pro se.
    APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas,
    Division of Domestic Relations, Juvenile Branch
    PER CURIAM.
    {¶ 1} Respondent-appellant, S.S., appeals the decision of the Franklin County
    Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, Juvenile Branch, which granted
    the appellee's petition for a Domestic Violence Civil Protection Order pursuant to R.C.
    3113.31.
    {¶ 2} On July 23, 2020, appellee, R.S., filed a petition requesting the trial court to
    issue a Domestic Violence Civil Protection Order, and the court issued a temporary order
    ex parte that same date. Appellant was personally served with a copy of the temporary
    order by a deputy sheriff on August 11, 2020. The court held a full hearing on appellant's
    petition on September 1, 2020. The court made findings of fact, granted the petition, and
    issued a five-year protection order on that date.
    {¶ 3} Appellant subsequently filed this appeal of the trial court's protection order,
    and in a brief has asserted four assignments of error, all of which take issue with the trial
    No. 20AP-409                                                                                  2
    court's findings of fact in support of the protection order. We observe, however, that
    appellant has failed to ensure that a transcript of the hearing was prepared and filed with
    this court for our review.
    {¶ 4} Our review of a trial court's decision to grant or deny a civil protection order
    is governed by an abuse of discretion standard. Parrish v. Parrish, 
    95 Ohio St.3d 1201
    , 1204
    (2002). But if there is no transcript of the proceedings in the record, "there is no basis upon
    which this court can make any finding with respect to the evidence."Eble v. Emery, 10th
    Dist. No. 06AP-1007, 
    2007-Ohio-4857
    , ¶ 9 (affirming the dismissal of a civil
    protection order where the appellant failed to "cause a transcript of the proceedings to be
    transmitted to this court"). It is the obligation of an appellant to provide the appellate court
    with a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court. See App.R. 9(B) and Knapp v.
    Edwards Laboratories, 
    61 Ohio St.2d 197
    , 199 (1980). Without a transcript to review the
    proceedings before the trial court, an appellate court must "presume the validity of the
    lower court's proceedings, and affirm." Knapp at 199.
    {¶ 5} Lacking an adequate record, we have no choice but to presume the regularity
    of the trial court's actions. We overrule appellant's assignments of error and affirm the
    judgment of the trial court.
    Judgment affirmed.
    SADLER, LUPER SCHUSTER, and BEATTY BLUNT, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20AP-409

Citation Numbers: 2021 Ohio 1384

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Filed Date: 4/20/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/20/2021