All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2015-06 |
-
PER CURIAM. We affirm, without discussion, Appellant’s convictions and sentences for possession of a controlled substance; resisting a law enforcement officer without violence; and driving while license is cancelled, suspended or revoked — second conviction. However, we conclude, and the State properly concedes, the trial court erred by imposing a Public Defender lien of $150 without providing Appellant an opportunity to contest it. See § 938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1) (“Notice of the accused’s right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien shall be given at the time of sentence.”); see also Vaughn v. State, 65 So.3d 138, 139 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“[T]he State properly concedes that the Public Defender lien fee should be stricken because the trial court did not advise [the defendant] of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the fees.”). We therefore remand for the trial court to either strike the $150 Public Defender lien or give Appellant the opportunity to contest the amount of the lien. See Chestnut v. State, 145 So.3d 193, 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 1D14-586
Citation Numbers: 164 So. 3d 806, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8752, 2015 WL 3561477
Judges: Bilbrey, Marstiller, Thomas
Filed Date: 6/9/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024