F.W. v. State , 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2862 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court *429erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So.3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

    AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

    SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 5D09-2138

Citation Numbers: 29 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2862

Judges: Orfinger, Sawaya, Torpy

Filed Date: 3/5/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024