All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2010-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court
*429 erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So.3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 5D09-2138
Citation Numbers: 29 So. 3d 428, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2862
Judges: Orfinger, Sawaya, Torpy
Filed Date: 3/5/2010
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024