-
Justice SAYLOR, concurring.
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that an inventory search was not warranted on the particular facts of this case, as well as with its rejection of the bright-line rule, proposed by the Commonwealth, that all vehicle immobilizations justify constitutionally valid inventory searches. To the extent the majority opinion reflects a bright-line rule to the converse (ie., that no inventory searches conducted in connection with immobilizations may be valid), however, I remain circumspect and reserve my own judgment.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 83 A.3d 94, 623 Pa. 434, 2013 WL 6823057, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 3250
Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd
Filed Date: 12/27/2013
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024