-
OPINION
PER CURIAM. Respondent, Judge Gene Knize, did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56 (Tex.2003), when he ruled. We deny the petition for mandamus, without prejudice, to allow him to reconsider his ruling. See In re de la Garza, 92 S.W.3d 416 (Tex.2001) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Van Waters & Rogers Inc., 988 S.W.2d 740 (Tex.1998) (orig.proceeding) (per curiam).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 10-03-015-CV
Citation Numbers: 134 S.W.3d 359, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 10483, 2003 WL 22937327
Judges: Allen, Gray, Vance
Filed Date: 12/10/2003
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024