Gambrel v. Gambrel , 2016 Ky. App. LEXIS 97 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • J. LAMBERT,

    concurring:

    I am bothered, as is the author of this opinion, by what I consider to be a “harsh result” in this case.

    However, as is obvious, we cannot consider testimony in our decision making process which has not been provided to us; and, as the opinion states, “each time we do not strictly apply the rules we erode them.”

    Accordingly, I reluctantly concur in this opinion as written. :.

Document Info

Docket Number: NO. 2016-CA-000028-ME

Citation Numbers: 501 S.W.3d 900, 2016 Ky. App. LEXIS 97, 2016 WL 3213216

Judges: Dixon, Lambert, Nickell

Filed Date: 6/10/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024