Hollis v. Brown ( 1894 )

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. Assuming, as we must, for the purposes of this appeal, that all the averments contained in the affidavit of defence are true, there is nothing in them that amounts to a defence to the plaintiff’s case.

Judgment affirmed.