Commonwealth v. Hine , 213 Pa. 97 ( 1905 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.

    *100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law.

    Per Curiam,

    October 80, 1905 :

    Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 216

Citation Numbers: 213 Pa. 97, 62 A. 369, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 379

Judges: Biiown, Elkin, Fell, Mesteezat, Mitchell, Pottee, Stewabt

Filed Date: 10/30/1905

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024