Galligan v. Heath ( 1918 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam,

    The learned court below could not have directed a verdict for the plaintiff, as requested by his first and second points. The question of fact for the jury, under the evidence, was as to the amount he was entitled to recover on his mortgage, and, as that has been established by the verdict, the judgment on it is affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 245

Judges: Brown, Frazer, Izisker, Mosci, Potter, Walling

Filed Date: 3/4/1918

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024